|
|
Post by Vandals on Nov 18, 2014 12:15:38 GMT -5
Do we change it up, and let the dropped players go to free agency and rookie draft pool
|
|
|
|
Post by bhucks83 on Nov 18, 2014 17:05:03 GMT -5
Is this for in season Active Roster?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyclones on Nov 18, 2014 17:19:38 GMT -5
I think post season. What we'd have to cut to. I think. Might be wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vandals on Nov 18, 2014 18:17:50 GMT -5
in season active rosters
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyclones on Nov 18, 2014 18:20:08 GMT -5
Would we be starting the same amount of people? If
Lowered?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vandals on Nov 18, 2014 18:22:31 GMT -5
yep, this would basically cut some offensive player hoarding a little
|
|
|
|
Post by Vandals on Nov 18, 2014 18:39:53 GMT -5
28 looks like this
2 qb
4 rb
5 wr
2 te
1 k
3 DE
5 lb
5 db
with 1 extra hoard, these numbers pretty much cover byes for most part, this makes us manage our teams more closely, and we wont be able to hoard offense cause we need defensive backups, it will also make us spend FBDs, make trades to cover bye weeks on our weakest rb wr or lb.
Im pushing hard for 28........as much as id hate to cut guys
Then taxi would be 4 or 5 players with 2 year development max
|
|
|
|
Post by NorthportCrabs on Nov 18, 2014 21:19:57 GMT -5
roster size in season is fine. Offseason should be slashed.
|
|
|
|
Post by knittel29 on Nov 18, 2014 22:37:41 GMT -5
I'm with Crabs on this for now... I just proposed the slashed roster to keep Free Agency going... But I'm not gonna haul off and quit because it gets lowered... I can see both sides of the argument
|
|
